Ucrania, Estados Unidos y Rusia protagonizan en Abu Dabi la primera ronda trilateral desde febrero

Por qué importa

La reunión了一丝 en una木工rypto signs of renewed high-level diplomacy after a long pause and became a direct test of whether Washington could bring Russia to negotiations that include European security guarantees. The reported agreement on a large-scale prisoner exchange provided an immediate humanitarian result, while the dispute over the sequence of a ceasefire and security negotiations exposed the central obstacle to a broader agreement.

Qué ha ocurrido

The first day of trilateral talks between Ukraine, the United States and Russia took place in Abu Dhabi on 10 November. Before the trilateral meeting, the Ukrainian delegation held separate consultations with the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, NATO, the European Commission, and the US special representatives Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. European delegations did not join the main negotiating room because Russia opposed their direct participation.

The talks discussed humanitarian steps and possible parameters for de-escalation. The release of prisoners of war was identified as Ukraine's priority, and the parties reportedly agreed to conduct a large-scale prisoner exchange. Security guarantees for Ukraine, the foundations for their long-term operation, European security, Russia's security demands, and Ukraine's post-war future also formed part of the discussions. Zelensky described the first day as constructive and substantive. The next round was scheduled for 11 November.

Cómo lo cuentan las fuentes ucranianas

Ukrainian officials and media focused on Ukraine's priorities: stopping hostilities, reliable postwar security guarantees, economic recovery and development, and humanitarian measures. They stressed that any settlement must respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity and preserve Ukraine's right to decide its own security arrangements. Ukrainian representatives also opposed proposals to exchange parts of Donbas for vague security assurances and favoured stopping fire on the current lines before negotiating a new European security architecture.

Cómo lo cuentan las fuentes internacionales

International coverage highlighted the United States' mediation role, the presence of European and NATO officials, and the possibility of moving to a broader multilateral format. The prisoner exchange was presented as the clearest immediate outcome. Coverage also examined competing US proposals involving sanctions, security guarantees, territorial arrangements and access to European energy markets, alongside Ukrainian and European opposition to several of them. Russian statements emphasised readiness to maintain contacts but rejected European demands and immediate cessation of hostilities without clearly defined security parameters.

Dónde difieren las versiones

The main disagreement concerned the order of negotiations. Ukraine and Europe sought an immediate end to hostilities before discussions on a new European security architecture, while Russia rejected an immediate ceasefire without clearly defined security parameters and favoured defining that architecture first. Russia also rejected direct European participation in the main talks, whereas the United States and Ukraine sought broader European involvement in the next round. American proposals included possible administrative-border changes that would allow Russia to claim full control of Donetsk and Luhansk while Ukrainian-controlled cities remained under Ukrainian authority, as well as restoring Russian access to European energy markets during the war; Ukraine and its European partners rejected both ideas, and no agreement was reached.

Contexto

Before the talks, Ukraine coordinated with European and US partners on security guarantees and the postwar architecture of European security. Participants sought a practical, mutually reinforcing security system that would strengthen Ukraine's long-term protection and create confidence for a negotiated settlement, while confirming that a strong NATO would remain central to Euro-Atlantic collective defence. The US administration reportedly explored sanctions relief, American security guarantees, territorial arrangements and energy-market access as possible incentives. The trilateral meeting was the first of this format since February 2026.